Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 July 29

< July 28	July 30 >

July 29

File:Mary Taylor Color.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Reaper Eternal (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:17, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mary Taylor Color.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Orphaned. Unlikely that the copyright is owned by the uploader. Tin eye. Marcus Qwertyus 04:28, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image appears in this article, quoted as "Courtesy of Ohio House of Representatives". Nik thestoned 16:27, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:New York '06 224.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:New York '06 224.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Although taken by the uploader, the badge will be copyright Avon and Somerset police. Mtking^(edits) 09:04, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't dispute that. Don't even remember taking it and didn't know much about copyright anyway. To be honest don't know why I ever uploaded such a crappy useless picture. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 18:34, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:DSC02001.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC02001.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Looks like a photo of a photo, this is backed up by the fact that the summary is 'ccj newsletter'. Therefore, the PD-self claim on this is probably invalid. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 14:10, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Enedinafelix.JPG

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2012 September 16.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enedinafelix.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is all over the internet - I doubt this user "created this work entirely by themselves"... Nik thestoned 16:23, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So because people have copied my image, which I first posted on Blog Del Narco in the forums and later on Borderland Beat and Border Reporter, all three of which are the biggest websites regarding the Mexican drug culture, it is not mine somehow anymore? It is the only image available of her, so obviously people would copy it. This picture was taken in San Diego at a real estate conference which she was attending, the picture was of her and a group of other attendees, it was enlarged because you could barely see her in between 2 peoples heads.. She said she owned a Tijuana real-estate company, Grupo Inmobiliario Professional Baja, amongst other businesses. She claimed to be a businesswoman. jlcoving (talk) 22:07, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Badass barrett.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:08, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Badass barrett.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The uploader states that the image is free to use because of a belief "there is no copyright for this picture", but no reason is given for this assertion. —innotata 17:14, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Australian Navy Cadets Ensign.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Australian Navy Cadets Ensign.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Doubt the Australian Navy Cadets released their official ensign under the WTF Public License! Acather96 (talk) 17:25, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Like any Flag used by the ADFC pictures and images of them are not under copyright, but only when the picture is taken with a Defence Establishment in the back ground. Nford24 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:A Statue of Blessed Pedro Calungsod at Molo Church in Iloilo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Statue of Blessed Pedro Calungsod at Molo Church in Iloilo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

May be {{Non-free 3D art}}. When was the statue made? –Drilnoth (T/C) 20:29, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bhabananda deka.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bhabananda deka.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Based on the nature and quality of the image, I highly doubt the uploader is the copyright holder. Orphaned. –Drilnoth (T/C) 20:42, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Fabulance Splash.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fabulance Splash.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Almost certainly a copyvio. –Drilnoth (T/C) 20:44, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If it is then File:Fabulance BlueBalls.jpg will be too... Both were, however, uploaded by someone representing the company (or at least seemingly so). Nik thestoned 12:08, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, I'll nominate the other one now. Delete this one as an obvious copy-vio. Acather96 (talk) 10:50, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Image-BSUInt.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Image-BSUInt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Orphaned. Presumably copyrighted logo. –Drilnoth (T/C) 20:48, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RH(band).jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:RH(band).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Uploader originally used non free promo license, switching to free license after it was pointed out that there are free use images available for the band on Flickr. Band is presently working. We hope (talk) 23:12, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please reconsider as:

The file was uploaded originally under wrong license and corrected and the Flickr photos suggested were not of the same band named Random Hero from Parker, CO. Photos suggested were for a German band of the same name. -Mac — Preceding unsigned comment added by Machowell (talk • contribs) 08:35, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.